10 thoughts on “Election 2025: Letters of Endorsement

  1. Chris Wilson’s comments are as sad as the Caucus was a fiasco. Again another RTC insider with tunnel vision and false innuendo. Chris Wilson was instrumental in changing the caucus rules 2 hours before speeches without informing Candidate Norton. Again Kim Norton is a Connecticut Secretary of State validated Republican candidate confirmed by our Town Clerk Claudia Weber. Again it is apparent that the so called PAC slate candidates are afraid of a fair in- biased election in November. It is the slate that is besmirching Kim Norton behind her back. They have the audacity to spread a falsity that Kim has broken the law. What.law? Her constitutional and State supported right to run for office after she was bullied at the Caucus. In fact it is the so called Slate incumbent who has a questionable past and record.

    My fellow New Canaanites are getting tired of the slate and their fellow insiders besmirching and bullying Kim.

    New Canaanites are smarter than the False Slate/PAC rhetoric and Nov 4th will show what we in New Canaan stand for: Truth, honesty, fairness and respect for all.

  2. Hay Chris
    I hear you are one of the architect of this
    Slate of 4 –
    So why wouldn’t you be so passionate about promoting it
    You can’t fool us — nice try

    • This is completely untrue. I was not involved in putting the slate together and only got involved with the slate committee when Kim re-entered the race.

      But thank you to Richard and Roy for illustrating the point of my LTE.

      Chris

  3. Whatever our politics, Kim Norton has helped a lot of people in this community.

    Loyalty tests don’t build trust—listening and working together do. Let’s focus on character, work ethic, and solutions that serve everyone.

  4. Chris Wilson’s letter rightly emphasizes the importance of the caucus but overlooks how the Republican Town Committee itself undermined that very process.
    The caucus is designed to empower Republican voters to choose candidates based on merit, not machinery. Yet this July, the RTC pre-selected and promoted a slate of candidates before a single vote was cast. That endorsement widely circulated and coordinated signaled to voters that the outcome was already decided. It discouraged independent voices and reduced the caucus to a formality. Why even hold a caucus?
    Worse, it was an insult to the intelligence of Republican voters. Telling them how to vote before the caucus not only disrespects their judgment it betrays the very grassroots principles the caucus is meant to uphold.
    And it raises a serious question: what makes three “newcomers” more qualified than a sitting Republican Town Council member with a proven track record?
    If we truly value the caucus, we must protect its integrity. That means rejecting insider endorsements before the vote and welcoming all Republicans who want to serve whether they win the caucus or choose another lawful path to the ballot.

    • This has happened for the last three election cycles. And each of them comes with a required loyalty pledge to support the winners if you lose or be cast out.

      • However such “loyalty pledge” is invalid when the caucus is biased, pre- determined by misleading statements at the caucus and last minute rule changes . 9 votes in my statistical analysis under such scenario is a statistical tie. Again why are these Slate candidates afraid of a un biased fair overall election on Nov 4. Let all New Canaan electors voice their vote and properly select the members of our Legislative branch.

  5. Chris Wilson’s letter smearing Kim Norton is full of biased inaccuracies and untruths. Kim Norton is endorsed by the Republican Party and to say otherwise is simply false. By law, a candidate is endorsed by the party when she collects sufficient signatures to be on the Republican line in November which Kim did despite efforts by Chris and others to stop her.

    Kim’s presence on the ballot does not undermine Republican’s chance of winning in November. Everyone is allowed up to 6 votes, so she is not taking away any votes from the other 4 Republicans running for Town Council.

    Chris says that Kim was wrong to say that the votes from the caucus were hidden, but there was no place that voters could find the actual vote tallies from the July caucus unless they were already on the Republican Town Council (“RTC”) mailing list.

    Chris also claims that Kim is incorrect in saying that the other candidates “barely inched out” a victory, but Kim only fell short by 9 votes. If a single-digit loss is not close, what is?

    It’s also worth noting that unlike other local elections in recent years, the RTC is not providing the main source of funding for the Republican candidates running in competitive races. That is because former RTC chairmen Chris Wilson and Jon Cheng resigned from their leadership positions leaving the RTC with almost no money in the bank. Instead, they formed their own PAC, the New Canaan GOP 2025 PAC, to raise and spend money outside of the control of the RTC for their preferred candidates.

    Kim is an indispensable member of Town Council who will speak her mind and stand up for what she believes in. I hope you can join me in voting for Kim this November.

  6. Chris Wilson inadvertently underscores the exact traits that characterize an effective Town Council member. Kim Norton is tenacious, understands the law, reads the fine print and asks the tough questions in order to advocate for New Canaan tax payers. She is passionate about keeping New Canaan one of the best places in the country to live, work, raise a family, attend public schools, and age in place. Please join me in re-electing Kim Norton to Town Council.