Letter to the Editor

More

NewCanaanite.com recently received the following letter. Send letters to editor@newcanaanite.com to have them published here.

***

I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed ordinance banning or restricting gas-powered leaf blowers (GLBs) in our community. Gas-powered leaf blowers are an environmental and public-health burden that we should not endure for the sake of convenience when practical, quieter, and cleaner options exist.

Key reasons to support this ban and its provisions:

– Noise pollution and health impacts: GLBs generate extremely loud, low-frequency noise that penetrates walls and windows. A single blower can reach approximately 100 decibels, and when used in multiples, the impact on nearby residents is substantial. The resulting disturbance affects sleep, mental health, and overall well-being, with links to cognitive challenges and stress-related health problems.

– Air pollution and public health: Gas-powered blowers contribute to ozone formation, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, nitrous oxide, and hydrocarbons. They also blow dust containing pesticides, lead, pollen, mold, and animal feces into the air, aggravating asthma and cardiopulmonary conditions—placing children and vulnerable residents at particular risk. Comparisons cited by researchers indicate that short-term GLB use can produce pollution burdens comparable to lengthy vehicle trips.

– Soil health and environment: The high-velocity blasts degrade soil structure, reduce soil nutrients, and can worsen drought and flood susceptibility by disrupting natural soil processes. This makes lawns more reliant on chemical inputs and less resilient to climate-related stresses.

– Biodiversity and ecosystem services: Repeated blasts kill insects and damage the habitat of soil-dwelling and pollinator species, undermining natural pest control and reducing biodiversity. Healthy pollinator and predator insect populations are essential for resilient landscapes and gardens.

The ordinance as proposed provides a balanced path forward, with targeted restrictions aimed at reducing harm while recognizing practical needs:

– Prohibiting the use of GLBs Memorial Day through Labor Day (I would urge the ban to be until mid-October when leaves are actively falling).

– Limiting electric leaf blower usage to specific hours, effectively reducing early-morning and late-evening disturbances, weekends, and holidays.

– Clearly articulated exemptions for emergency use, town/public works, and limited residential use only on hard surfaces.

I consider this a small, prudent step toward cleaner air and a more peaceful community. I respectfully urge you to adopt these restrictions and to consider extending them through mid-October (the time leaves begin to drop more consistently) with the goal of ongoing progress toward more comprehensive protections in the future.

There are viable alternatives that are better for health and the environment. Mulching and leaving grass clippings to decompose, along with mulch mowing, improve soil moisture and fertility and reduce the need for additional inputs. For those who prefer mechanical assistance, electric leaf blowers (when allowed under the ordinance) are markedly quieter and produce far fewer pollutants than gas-powered models. In my own practice, I urge my landscapers to avoid all blowers when possible, relying on mulching and natural wind to manage leaves, and the results have been perfectly acceptable for our landscape.

Thank you for considering this important step toward cleaner air, quieter neighborhoods, and a healthier environment for all residents.

Sincerely,

Polly Goodyear

7 thoughts on “Letter to the Editor

  1. Bravo! Eloquently professionally written encompassing the community as a whole. Hears to Lars Anderson, Katie Owsley & many other residents that understand the full environmental long term impact which is detrimental. I fully support banning not only during Summer but completely knowing there are healthier alternatives like 31 surrounding communities that stepped forward to remedy this extremely important situation. Do what is right step forward.

  2. Well said Polly. I commend the bylaws subcommittee for this initiative. As residents who leave and then mulch our leaves and only blow (electrically) our hard surfaces, it is not all we would want in an ordinance. But we are making a start. When you have young neighbors who moved here from the city telling you “we had more peace and quiet in Manhattan” we need to start.

    Rob Fryer

  3. Hear, hear, Polly.

    For comparison, the decibel level of a commercial jet, on takeoff, is 100-120 decibels from 1000 feet away. Just sayin’.

  4. Polly: I agree with you 100%. You may want to note that, yesterday, our state legislators held a hearing on SB 319–a bill that would phase out gas blowers statewide. I urge you to write to your state reps and ask them to support the bill. The landscapers are fighting it like crazy –recycling their usual arguments designed to scare people (e.g., that the bill will raise costs, that the battery equipment is not up to the task, etc.)–all of which have proven to be untrue. Our legislators need to hear from people like you.

  5. It’s great to hear the false narrative that “only a minority of the town cares about this” be debunked. While we may disagree (which is what makes a healthy democracy) it’s great that our elected representatives have been responsive to the interests of our community. Special props to Hilary Ormond for drafting the ordinance thus ensuring that our public comments are able to be heard and considered, and for us to follow both good science and common sense in self governing on this issue.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *