2 thoughts on “Election 2025: Letters of Endorsement 

  1. Proving my point that this election is, well, weird, the Republicans have decided to run against a sitting BOE member who *is not* on the ballot, and whose command of the issues that need attention from our BOE is unparalleled, instead of those they are actually running against. I get it-the other candidates are uber-qualified and neither Ms. Toal nor those backing her want to address the things that she herself has said and done, because dog whistle terms like “parents rights” are kryptonite in the current environment. New Canaan, elect BOE members who will protect what makes our schools great, not those “working quietly” to change them.

  2. I must second everyone who wrote yesterday asking Julie Toal and her BOE colleagues to be extremely specific about what kind of “parental input” they consider appropriate when deciding issues relating to our schools.

    I’m a parent but my son is 28 and attended public school in Pennsylvania. Do I count? I’m a retired clinical, developmental, and school psychologist and parent of the aforementioned dude – do I count? My husband is stepdad to the same dude, same question.

    So often across the country, “parent input” boils down to a few loudest voices raised on issues regarding library books, or DEI discussions in classrooms, or posting the 10 Commandments, or the “war on Christmas”. If this is the kind of parent input being supported, no thank you.

    But I can’t know without more information and neither can anyone else.

    Also, thanks Kim Norton for your courage on the North School issue. This unaffiliated voter appreciates that kind of integrity.