Officials say they’re concerned for the welfare of a deer that appears to be dragging a “leghold trap” from one of its hind legs.
The young buck dragging the trap was spotted Tuesday on Pequot Lane, according to Officer Allyson Halm, head of the New Canaan Police Department’s Animal Control section.
“He wasn’t moving too quickly,” Halm told NewCanaanite.com. “It was a pretty large trap and you could see the leg was swollen compared to the other one.”
The traps use a footplate and curved jaws that snap onto animals that spring them. Halm said the traps are not supposed to be placed where deer can get into them.
It isn’t clear where the deer stepped on the trap or how long he’s been suffering.
A state Environmental Conservation or ‘EnCon’ officer did respond to Halm’s report of the distressed animal, in hopes of immobilizing the deer with a tranquilizer and removing the trap, she said. Unfortunately, however, the animal could not be located.
“I am hoping the deer will be spotted again and the officers can come down with their equipment and we can resolve it,” she said.
Halm added that she has serious concerns not only about the pain the animal is certainly suffering but also about the buck’s ability to survive while hampered by the trap. The trap will both restrict his movement and make him highly audible prey for coyotes. Unless he’s found and freed, such predators “will just wear him down,” she said.
“It’s very sad,” she said. “Very hard to watch. The people that called it in were devastated and frustrated that there was not a lot we could do.”
Halm said she’s hoping that the trap itself is tagged so that it can be traced to the individual who set it.
In Connecticut, the law that empowers the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection to regulate the trapping of fur-bearing animals includes provisions such as that snares are not allowed, no steel trap may be set within 100 feet of a permanent building, traps must be checked every 24 hours and trappers seeking to work on private land must obtain written permission annually from property owners before doing so. Violating the provisions of the law could rise to the level of a misdemeanor criminal offense. The DEEP further regulates trapping based on type of trap, target animal, pan tension and bait, and notes that “traps must be securely anchored to the ground.”
New Canaan has seen problems with leghold traps in the recent past. Two years ago, a coyote could be seen dragging one from its leg over a period of a weeks around northern New Canaan. Three years ago,, the unintended leg hold-trapping of a red fox on Briscoe Road led to an effort among concerned residents who urged town officials to consider a local ordinance banning the practice. Ultimately, a subcommittee of the Town Council, after consulting with the town attorney, found that New Canaan could not pass an ordinance that went against a state law.
In January 2017, a state legislator tried to introduce a bill that would allow individual municipalities to decide whether such “leghold” or “foothold” traps are allowed in their towns, rather than the state.
Halm said she wondered whether the trap that the deer is now dragging around was set by an amateur.
“I would beg them to stop and get better trained,” she said.
to stop this problem — get ride of the coyotes — the reason for the traps
their not catching minks — Again I said this before — the town should hire some one to humanly trap the coyotes and relocate them what would it cost $20,000+ to protect our pets and other wildlife — can’t be that many out there — just think if little Oreo had stepped into one of these traps he would have never made it back home
I just e-mailed our newly elected officials and incumbent (Alex Bergstein, Will Haskell, Tom O’Dea and Lucy Dathan) to support a bill which would allow local municipalities to decide whether to ban the use of leghold traps.
A powerful opponent is the DEEP. According to New Canaanite’s edition (January 8, 2017) DEEP opposes this bill that was introduced by State Rep Rep Camillo (R-151) last year.
““We just need people to reach out to their representatives and senators.”
Halm makes assumptions and speaks from opinion only. Her statement “the traps are not supposed to be placed where deer can get into them” is just a statement and not a rule of any sort. Trails and woods are used by all types of animals and a trap does not discriminate. I beg of you all to tell me where in the state of Connecticut does a deer not step outdoors. These foothold traps weren’t designed to be used ten foot up a tree. I would agree The trap should have been anchored properly but deer are strong and can pull an anchor up from soft ground or snap a anchor cable that could have been compromised. I’ve also had this happen and the deer pull right out easily, but for some reason this didn’t happen in this instance. This type of thing doesn’t happen everyday nor does it mean it was set by an uneducated trapper so any effort to use this article to push an anti-trapping agenda would not be well founded in facts. The anti-agenda was designed to capitalize on compassionate hearts. Fact is trappers do not want to see an animal suffer but they do need tools such as traps to manage populations of animals effectively. The DEEP will make efforts to find the deer and remove the trap and that’s really where this conversation should end.
Marty — maybe you can enlighten us — what are you trapping
“I’ve also had this happen” and why — we need to know and
who are you doing it for — the more info on this subject would
be helpful — and why not haveaheart traps that cause no pain ??