Town officials said last week they need to tap legal counsel prior to allowing Jehovah’s Witnesses to use a section of Mead Park for their ministry.
A representative from the South Salem, N.Y.-based congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses told members of the Parks & Recreation Commission during their regular meeting last week that they’d like to set up a cart for “witnessing” for personal ministry at Mead.
“The objective is Bible principles practical with family life,” Gabriel Almaguer told the Commission during its July 13 meeting, held at Lapham Community Center.
He brought a cart with him to the meeting to show the commissioners. It included a poster saying “Find Family Happiness” with pamphlets including “Awake! Six Lessons Children Need To Learn” “Your Family Can Be Happy” and “My Bible Lessons.”
“What we would do is set it up somewhere, stand next to it,” Almaguer said. “We don’t solicit or ask for donations. We will engage someone with a warm smile or a greeting.”
After much discussion, Commission Chair George Benington said the town would need to get clarification from legal counsel about what is required of the municipality with respect to the First Amendment right of free speech, as well as what can be regulated via local ordinance, and asked Almaguer to return for the next Parks & Rec meeting, scheduled for Sept. 14.
Commissioners asked Almaguer where he planned to set up (somewhere along the stone wall overlooking Mead Pond), how often the Jehovah’s Witnesses would be there (a pair of representatives could be there, for example, from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. on a Saturday, perhaps a weekday in addition), what the duration of the ministry would be (they could try it out for a month and then, if all goes well, continue on a month-to-month basis), and whether the Jehovah’s Witnesses themselves would be coming down from South Salem (there are members of the Christian denomination in New Canaan, and the congregation also serves towns such as Wilton and Ridgefield).
Almaguer asked whether, rather than being stationed by the stone wall, where people would need to cross a parking lot to get literature, the Jehovah’s Witnesses could set up near the entrance to the Mead Park Playground “between the dumpster and the actual play area.”
“We have stuff for kids,” he said.
The commissioners and town officials pushed back on the idea, saying that’s a very active pedestrian area with kids going back-and-forth between the playgrounds, baseball fields and Apple Cart Food Co., and that there also are many cars rolling by and the area shouldn’t be blocked.
Commissioner Keith Richey said the town should be careful about setting a precedent whereby any religious or political group would be allowed to have open use of public parks and “basically we would be bound to have to say yes to all of them.”
Commissioner Hank Green agreed, saying, “I’m uncomfortable about setting a precedent which allows them or any religious group or any political group to say ‘Hey, you’re allowing people to do this and we should be able to do it also.’ I just don’t think Mead Park, that is atmosphere or culture that we want to have in Mead Park. And there may be other places in New Canaan where the Jehovah’s Witnesses or anyone else can do this. I just don’t see Mead Park as the place for this to happen.”
Richey responded by saying, “I actually don’t think we have grounds to say no. I think they have a First Amendment right. There have been some Supreme Court cases lately. It’s a public park, it’s a public place, I think they essentially have a right to do it.”
Commissioner Gene Goodman said that free speech doesn’t necessarily mean any group can make any use it wants of a public space, such as putting up a 50-foot-wide banner.
“Freedom of speech doesn’t cover anything you want to do,” Goodman said.
Commissioner Steve Haberstroh said, “At the very least we probably look into this and maybe provide guidance to set a framework. I don’t want to infringe on anybody’s free speech, but I just feel like we should research it a bit and then provide guidance, whether it’s a designated area or certain times of the week.”
Almaguer agreed to return in September.
During the meeting, Goodman also said it wasn’t clear to him “whether this falls under the advertising situation.”
“It’s not obviously for a profit-making organization,” he continued. “But at the same time, it’s a ‘neither fish nor fowl kind of question,’ is it advertising or not? I don’t know how one answers that question. But certainly we do have prohibitions against advertising.”
Goodman himself has been a driving force behind the “ice rink” which was supposed to launch in Waveny Park last winter and is planned for a late-November opening this year. Parks & Rec last November voted 10-0 in favor of allowing advertising in the rink.
Under Section 42-8 of the Town Code, “No person shall distribute any handbills or circulars or post any bills, notices or advertising matter of any kind and nature in any park.”
Thanks Mike for bringing this request to your readers attention – I was not personally aware of it so it was news to me. As P&R engages lawyers to review this request, it would be a good opportunity to also review the 20 person limit on pre-permit gatherings in parks – I am not sure that is uniformly enforced.
The Jehovah’s Witnesses would have only two people at the cart, working in shifts, so that rule would not apply here.
My thinking was P&R should more holistically review their policies as I am sure this request will require, and the article indicates they will.
Mead Park is a Town Park. The Jehovah’s Witnesses are a religion. No mixing of Church and State, especially active ministry in Town Parks that we support with our taxes.
I am strongly against bringing sales and marketing into our parks in any form. Religion first, and then maybe the NRA can set up a booth? If I wanted to learn more about Jehovah’s Witnesses , any other belief or product, I will seek out that information on my own. Same can be said about exposing my children to them. Please don’t continue down this woke-ish path.
They have a right to free speech, yes, but does that include stationing a cart on a regular basis? I mean, free speech could be individuals standing there with pamphlets. I certainly would prefer not to have to go by the cart just to get to and from the playground.
Apparently door to door ministry work by various religious groups– mainly the Witnesses and Mormon groups is still quite legal, I’m not sure why they would be looking to change their proselytizing habits. Any private sales or promotions at parks should be reviewed as the article indicates to see what the law is. I’ve seen lemonade stands set up at Irwin Park which may be harmless but is against the rules governing the parks.
No thank you. If you need membership to your church maybe think about why your membership is dwindling. It certainly isn’t because people don’t know about you. I remember growing up (outside of CT) being constantly harassed by the Jehovah’s witnesses practically every weekend in our home and it wasn’t pleasant. Please don’t turn our parks into an unpleasant place.
Jesus Christ!! What next?
Proselytizing should not be allowed in town parks or on public property. Temporarily or permanently. It’s bad enough to be accosted on the streets by the Jehovah Witnesses. I’m an ex New Canaanite but still love my home town.
Please don’t allow this. As Mr. Woerz states, if people want to learn more about this religion (or any other), they are free to seek out that information for themselves.
Our parks are not free real estate for any business or non-profit to use.
Who the heck is running this town. We have contractors who think they can build anything they want and ravage our town, we have tree huggers ( all 100 of them) who are telling the rest of use, that saving a crappy old library ( for 2.5 million dollars) is a good idea, a first selectman that was the only person stupid enough to think moving the police station was a good idea ( for an extra seven million) and now a bunch of religious freaks who want to save us from ourselves. What’s next. Our town leaders are useless. Who’s going to save us from them. God help us all.
In the mid-1980s NOW (national organization for women) requested space for a similar setup to recruit members in the Westfarms Shopping Mall. When the owners refused the courts granted the request. Immediately, the Ku Klux Klan demanded equal treatment. The court ruled they couldn’t be turned away. When they appeared at the shopping mall in sheets trying to sign new recruits a riot ensued. The town’s counsel should look this over carefully. What is being proposed is recruitment and marketing, not speech. I served as public relations counsel for the mall’s owners, Taubman, Inc..