6 thoughts on “‘Tremendous Energy’: New Canaan Democrats Kick Off 2025 Local Election Campaign

  1. My guess is the biggest financial issue before the new BOE and town relates to the possibility of building a new elementary school. I am surprised that it appears neither slate of candidates is making any / much mention of this in their campaign material. My question is what is the desired public engagement process by the candidates on that decision, their views on the issue (or at a minimum what lens will they evaluate this through), and will this process be tied together with the zoning review of the town that appears to be kicking off in October?

  2. Since this town is all about the school, it’s safe to say that these candidates will not go against the BoE. The cause and effect of this is more taxes to support the increased BoE budget. Additionally, property values will increase, causing the grand list to increase, while reducing the mill rate but increasing the property taxes. These increased property values will make affordable housing further out of reach. So yes, we are in a loop.

  3. Well the facts are undistributable\– there is no shortage of space
    I sent to all town officials on 8-03-25 State forms filled out by
    school officials called ED050 facilities report it states the number
    of permeant classrooms in each school
    and if you take the number of classrooms in each school from the last report by the school officials. There are over 25 empty classrooms in k-4
    seems whoever in the school administration who gave the would be
    new school builders the wrong information — How could that happen ?
    on a 300 million project
    there are 2 FOI request that have not been answered for over 7 weeks on this subject

    • Richard, two FOI requests that have remained unfulfilled for seven weeks is completely unacceptable. After we learned that a new school was being proposed down the street, we submitted an FOI request for the presentation and had to wait three weeks for a single document. Being well-versed in FOI procedures, I can tell you that seven weeks—or even three weeks—is far too long for documents to be fulfilled. This is certainly outside standard practice. I strongly suggest you file a complaint with the FOI Commission and initiate the process for a hearing.
      For your awareness, the property in question for the proposed school lies within Federal wetlands and would require the Army Corps of Engineers to review and approve the building site for any proposed structure. That entire corridor feeds the Five Mile River, which is a federally regulated waterway requiring review and approval by the Army Corps. The presentation we requested—which took three weeks to obtain—showed no indication that this critical issue was even considered. These fundamental environmental concerns were completely overlooked in the document.
      Additionally, this property, the Clark estate, was embroiled in litigation after the town attempted to sell it to pay for Irwin Park. Attorney General Blumenthal reviewed the Clark deed, and in 2005, the Town presented evidence to the Connecticut Court stating that the Town “…despite many proposed uses has been unable to find a public use for the property for almost 50 years. There are multiple reasons why the property is unsuitable for public purposes, the principal ones being its location, its distance from public water and sewer, its topography, its lack of proper access for public use, and especially its plethora of water courses and wetlands.” None of the documents I have reviewed even address the impacts to wetlands—which are extensive—nor the sewer and infrastructure challenges. If you need assistance with FOI procedures, please let me know.

  4. Don’t let the truth get in your way when you want something !
    This is the Motto of the top school officials — been here 38 yrs
    I know them well — I’m not asking for anything that I don’t already have
    it’s just their conformation of the data — they will stall as long as possible
    Thank Jennifer

  5. Jennifer,
    The significant and well-founded concerns you have raised are further underscored by the fact that major telecommunications companies, such as Verizon, declined to pursue construction of a cell phone tower on the Clark Property due to the presence of sensitive wetlands, vernal pools, wildlife, and forests. It is important to note that the footprint of a cell phone tower and a single-lane access road is minimal in comparison to the proposed 80,000 square foot building, two multi-lane roads, sports fields, parking lots, wells, substantial underground fire suppression tanks, fuel tanks, and septic systems designed to accommodate up to 500 people per day. Once wetlands, vernal pools and other environmental issues are considered, the property is simply too small and fragile. This proposal’s unrealistic scale raises overwhelming doubts about its feasibility above and below ground.
    Additionally, it is likely that credit rating agencies would not approve an additional $300 million in debt without at least a ratings downgrade. This proposal would increase New Canaan’s total outstanding debt to $455 million and lead to higher borrowing costs, along with increases in real estate taxes to service principal and interest. The anticipated traffic associated with this massive project from numerous school buses, staff, fuel deliveries, parents, and vendors making turns onto a State Road without a traffic signal is an OSTA safety issue, and the proposed exit on Michigan Road presents completely unrealistic navigational challenges. Major changes would be required for State Road 123, North Wilton Road and Michigan Road.
    Future operational expenses must also be considered, including the need for additional administration, teaching staff, support personnel, police security, and maintenance. Transparency regarding all data, assumptions, and any consultant fees is essential; notably, related consultant expenditures were not identified in the Board of Education budget. Those seeking public office should clearly articulate their positions on these matters. As someone told me, “this project is like trying to stuff 50 pounds of nails into a container designed for five pounds.” Most with a practical financial background would say, it is time to look at existing resources and not waste time and money on improbable projects.
    Lastly, the Superintendent and his assistant are allegedly in charge of promptly responding to BOE FOIA requests. Connecticut State Law governs FOIA requests and “prompt” replies. Most taxpayers cannot imagine paid employees and BOE members want to break State Law or take a ride to Hartford only to be told to deliver what was simply requested in July.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *