Editorial: Darien Public Schools Music Dept Blog Posts Inappropriate Photo [UPDATED]


Part of a picture from the Darien Public Schools Music Department blog

Left side of picture

Take a look at these images. They’d be fine at a family picnic or among friends. The purpose of the school trip where the picture was taken was different. The picture should reflect that difference.

If these images would be fine representing Darien High School, then we need to rethink Darien High School. If this is how Darien children represent the school, then the rest of us who weren’t there can be expected to wonder how they behaved and, more important, how they were supervised.

Please see the 4:28 p.m. update below.

The two images below are taken from one picture published by the Darien Public Schools Music Department. We’ve reprinted the text from the same Music Department blog post where the picture came from.

The next time you come across a Darien Board of Education member, the superintendent, the high school principal or the head of the Music Department or a music teacher at the high school, please politely give them a piece of your mind, whatever you think about the propriety of this.

Is it the worst thing going on in the high school? We strongly doubt that. It’s simply a problem. (Here’s a worse problem at various schools in the area.)

So some will call us just a fuddy duddy, an old man yelling at kids to get off his lawn, etc., etc., etc. OK. Just note that we’re directing our objection where it belongs: At the high school administration, and indirectly at parents who haven’t taught their kids that this is not the way to present themselves.

And don’t tell us that it’s difficult to change this. It simply isn’t.

Part of a picture from the Darien Public Schools Music Department blog

Left side of picture

  • Members of the Darien High School Concert Choir and Tudor Singers pose with their award plaques from the Great East Adjudicated Music Festival held in Springfield, Massachusetts on May 19.  The Concert Choir was awarded a Gold rating, and the Tudor Singers earned a Platinum rating (the highest designation given). Both ensembles are under the direction of Christopher Andrade.

Part of a photo from the Darien Public Schools Music Department blog

Right side of the same photo


And we’ll note that most of the pictures that come from the high school and from the Music Department blog show students not behaving like this, and we never see it from students in the younger grades. And we’re not seeing it from plenty of the students in this picture. That tells you how manageable this is.

We also published on Monday a photo from a separate announcement about the Paraguayan ambassador visiting a Darien High School Spanish class. On Facebook, we posted this comment below the picture:

  • It isn’t hard to imagine that at a private school, the students would have been told to stand up straight, give a polite smile, button up their shirts and unroll their sleeves. In the past, that would have been done in public schools. DHS could do the same. (Don’t blame the students, here.)
UPDATE: 4:28 p.m.

Since this editorial was posted, we’ve received an email and two phone calls, along with a comment posted below, telling us that the students in the picture were asked for a funny pose. The editorial was directed at school district officials and employees and parents, not the students — but we did, as any sane person would, assume that the kids were acting as kids on their own and weren’t asked to pose in a funny way.

One of the callers said she was the parent who took the picture. In and of itself, the picture isn’t the problem. The problem is that it was posted as a representation of the Darien High School group. If it wasn’t the students being disrespectful to their school, band and the organizers of the event, then it was those involved in posting the picture.

An explanation on the blog that the kids were asked to pose that way would have changed our objection: It still isn’t an appropriate picture for a public blog representing the school district, but if there are special circumstances like kids being encouraged to act silly, the people posting on the blog have an obligation to everybody to make that clear.

Clearly an apology is owed to the students, the school and the organizers of the event. And not by us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 19:59:19 GMT Server: Apache/2.4.6 (CentOS) PHP/7.2.27 X-Powered-By: PHP/7.2.27 Link: ; rel="https://api.w.org/", ; rel=shortlink X-TEC-API-VERSION: v1 X-TEC-API-ROOT: https://newcanaanite.com/wp-json/tribe/events/v1/ X-TEC-API-ORIGIN: https://newcanaanite.com Vary: Accept-Encoding Cache-Control: max-age=3600 Expires: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 20:59:19 GMT Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade Keep-Alive: timeout=5, max=99 Connection: Keep-Alive Transfer-Encoding: chunked Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 2000 Committee Seeks To Double ‘Demolition Delay’ Period from 90 to 180 Days | NewCanaanite.com Committee Seeks To Double ‘Demolition Delay’ Period from 90 to 180 Days – NewCanaanite.com

12 thoughts on “Committee Seeks To Double ‘Demolition Delay’ Period from 90 to 180 Days

  1. Wow— what message are we sending. This is punitive for the buyer of an older home. Why would the citizens of New Canaan allow this much control on personal property by 5 individuals?

  2. My thought is that it had the potential to punitive for the seller more so than the buyer possibly adversely impacting property values.

  3. I encourage the adoption of the 180-day delay. It will make a developer and home owner think twice before demolishing an historic building, which is the purpose of the delay ordinance. Many of our neighboring towns adopted this extension years ago.
    Thank you Laszlo and the Historic Review Committee for moving forward with this proposal – it’s about time we caught up!

      • Guess because it is a barn, Arnold. To me, it is an eyesore that needs to be removed, just like the old building at Mead Park.

      • The c1880 cow barn, part of the Davenport Dairy Farm. It is behind the nicely preserved administration (main) building at the end of the driveway from Frogtown Rd and visible from Ponus Ridge.

  4. Sounds like the typical government waste of time. We change our phones every 2 years but would love to showcase our dilapidated historical homes in a town that is known for being on the forefront of the modern home. Sounds like an oxymoron. Just let people build what they want within the town rules and leave Ye Olde House to those who want to keep it.

  5. To Ms. Findlay,
    The question becomes the definition of a historically valuable structure which is why the Historic Review Committee should complete the list as charged in the original adoption of the Demolition Delay Ordinance. In my humble opinion; It seems to me that this initiative is moreover driven by the Preservation Allaince than the Historic Review Committee?

    • The 19th century barn built by William Davenport for his farm, long before the the Grace Church in NYC bought the property to build the large existing house for city children to enjoy a stay in the healthy rural country. The big red barn is visible from Ponus Ridge where the school buses park.

    • Not sure where this is coming from Brian, considering that the NCPA and Laszlo Papp have just spent an extended period of time in public disagreement! Something tells me Laszlo is not taking direction from the Preservation Alliance.

      Having said that, as Chief Building Official you are responsible for enforcing the CT State Building Code and any additional ordinances that New Canaan may enact…and that’s for every construction project in town. A little neutrality seems appropriate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *